Dissidents in Action: UC Santa Barbara Professor Challenges Students' Thinking on Gaza

Duke Helfand of The Los Angeles Times reported today that University of California Santa Barbara sociology professor, William I Robinson sent an email to his students containing "more than two dozen photographs of Jewish victims of the Nazis, including those of dead children, juxtaposed with nearly identical images from the Gaza Strip."

"Gaza is Israel's Warsaw--a vast concentration camp that confined and blockaded Palestinians," wrote Robinson in the email. "We are witness to a slow-motion process of genocide."

Two Jewish students dropped the class and filed a complaint with the UC Santa Barbara, on advice from the Simon Wiesenthal Center. Both the center and the Anti-Defamation League have characterized Robinson as an anti-Semite. Big surprise: that's how they characterize anyone that expresses disapproval over Israeli policy. The first problem with such an accusation is that it's no more anti-Semitic to critique Israeli treatment of Palestinians in Gaza than it is anti-American to criticize the torture of detainees in Guantanimo. The second problem the accusation is that Robinson is a Jew. A self-loathing Jew, perhaps? Hardly. I don't consider myself to be a self-loathing American, and I speak out on Gitmo constantly. Germans are, of course, expected to speak out against the Holocaust; is that anti-German? Are white South Africans who speak out against Apartheid anti-white?

The charge of anti-semitism is damned silly and those who make it against Robinson would do well to remember the words of Hermann Goering, who used the same tool on an unsuspecting Germany:

"[T]he people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country."

Although I am not a Jew, I reject the notion that my criticisms of the Israeli policy on the Palestinians is in any way anti-Semitic. It's not even anti-Israel. Like Robinson, I have compared the ethnic cleansing taking place in Gaza right now with the Nazis marginalizing and terrorizing the Jewish people, first in Germany, and then later througout Europe. And while the truth is that the current Israeli Gaza policy is nearer to South African Apartheid than the Holocaust, it seems to be escalating rapidly. Having corralled 1.5 million people in an area that's about 139 square miles (less than 15% the size of California's bustling Orange County, home to just over 3 million people), the Israel has gone beyond its historic treatment of the Palestinians, which more closely paralleled South African Apartheid (Olmert referred to treatment of Palestinians in the West Bank as a "pogrom"), thus justifying Robinson's characterization of Gaza as "Israel's Warsaw." And while Israel has yet to begin a program of rapid extermination, its slow, relentless ethnic cleansing of Palestinians from the population of Israel has been going on for far too long to be dismissed as unintentional or accidental.

This post is written in defense of a Jew; a man of conscience who has the courage to ask his students, Jew and non-Jew alike, to distinguish between what governments claim they do in the name of their people and what a free people must do when polities lead an otherwise well-intentioned people astray. There is a reason Professor Robinson mentions Nazis in the context of the Gaza offensive, written in the blood of his own people: NEVER AGAIN. Not just for Jews. Not just for Russians or Poles or Gypsies or homosexuals who were imprisoned and enslaved and even exterminated by the same hate-fueled Nazi war machine that killed Jews, but for any ethnic group whose culture, religion or very existence presents a challenge to those who hold power.

Professor Robinson is in no wise anti-Semitic, and is, in fact completely innocent of such a baseless and foolish charge. On the contrary, William I. Robinson represents what is best and most admirable about Jewish people: he is a critical thinker and a conscientious individual, one that clearly thinks highly of Israel, else why would he expect better of it? Nazi hunter, Simon Wiesenthal, wasn't a bully, but he hunted them, caught them and brought them back to Israel for something they'd never given their victims: a trial. It is, therefore, a sad accident of history that his name is used to bully a man whose criticisms seek to pull a nation back from the precipice, poised on the edge of the abyss1.

1. "Whoever battles with monsters had better see that it does not turn him into a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you" (Friedrich Nietzche).

The Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune Caught in Collusion to Aid Israel's Propaganda War

To the Editors of the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune:

In the story, "Israeli Military Says Gaza Pullout Complete," the Los Angeles Times printed that U.N Secretary General Ban Ki-Moon "called rocket attacks against Israel 'appalling and unacceptable.'" This is not only misleading, it is completely false. The Los Angeles Times further attempted to mislead its readers on the front page article, "UN Chief Tours Gaza Strip, Israeli Town," by repeating Ban's alleged statement. Of course, this goes further, as a story in the Chicago Tribune parrots the UN Chief misquote. A more reliable source has fully quoted Ban as saying:


"Ladies and gentlemen, I have seen only a fraction of the damage. This is shocking and alarming. This is heartbreaking scenes which I have seen, and I am deeply grieved by what I have seen today. I’m just appalled. I’m not able to describe how I’m feeling, having seen this site of the bombing of the United Nations compound. Everyone is now smelling this burning still. It is still burning. This, an outrageous and totally unacceptable attack against the United Nations."


Ban was referring to the destruction of the United Nations headquarters last week, set ablaze when Israel attacked it, destroying hundreds of tons of food and aid, badly needed by the refugees caught between Hamas and Israel. In fact, Ban has called for the attack on the UN headquarters to be investigated as a possible war crime.

But it seems likely that both organizations already knew this.

It is one thing to be Pro-Israel. It is another to omit facts and distort the words of a UN leader to help propagate the notion that Israel has been fully justified in its assault on Gaza. In referring to the New York Times and the London Times, it is clear that the Los Angeles Times and its parent company, the Chicago Tribune, are quite alone in their foray into fiction. The fact that two different writers for two different papers owned by the same company, have misquoted the UN Secretary identically, suggests that the Chigaco Tribune, et. al is not reporting the news as it happens, but rather, is acting on an agenda. All speculation aside, I demand that the Los Angeles Times and the Chicago Tribune each print a retraction to include Ban's full statement, as well as an apology to your readers, to UN Secretary General Ban and to the victims of the Gaza massacre, a massacre for which your organizations have offered tacit support through the publication of such misleading stories.

Update: The Los Angeles Times and Chicago Tribune might have been following an AP feed when they printed their stories. The Associated Press also misrepresented Ban Ki-moon's statement as a condemnation of Hamas' attacks on Israel:


"Ban later visited the rocket-scarred Israeli town of Sderot, where he called the Hamas' attacks over the last eight years against Israeli residents 'appalling and unacceptable.'"


This would be the third time in as many months that the AP has been exposed for mis-stating facts in pursuit of an agenda.

Open Letter: a Call for Israeli and Palestinian Insubordination

I've written my Senators and representative so many times about Gaza that I swear, I've gone into syndication with them. No response. Is this thing on? Hello-oooooooooo?! Nothing. And did you hear? Over 1100 Palestinians dead--mostly children--and Hillary Clinton says there aren't going to be any talks with Hamas. In other words, meet the new boss, same as the old boss.

Change, my rosey red kiester.

I cannot be silent as these destructive forces--forces that I sponsor with my taxes--continue to massacre innocent people. Between Israel and Hamas, the Jews and Palestinians are just public relations poker chips. And just like Wall Street, what Israel and Hamas gamble with doesn't belong to them in the first place. Most people in Israel aren't soldiers or fighters or guerrillas or spies or terrorists. They're just people getting blown to pieces because the megalomaniacal cowards don't have the balls to stand toe to toe with each other and settle their differences.

And while Hamas fires rockets into populated areas of southern Israel; their aim sucks: they Israeli body count is at thirteen, ten of whom were soldiers, and four of those killed by friendly fire. Israel, with full US backing is using Gaza as a military laboratory, testing out DIME (Dense Inert Metal Explosive) bombs, which has the unique function of dismembering people without leaving any shrapnel in them. Oh, and did I mention it causes cancer? It gives a whole new meaning to the phrase "dropping a DIME," eh?

So smoke 'em if you got 'em, kids! Lung cancer will be a pleasant death by comparison--not that you're gonna live that long. And for those of you that haven't been killed by the bombs, did we mention that the Israelis are unveiling--just in time for the Oscars--the latest and greatest in chemical peels, white phosphorus! Because while most chemical peels only get rid of the epidermis layer, making your skin look fresh and new, white phosphorus burns through all of your skin--and then it keeps going, burning your skin off, right down to the bone! My, won't you be a sight on the red carpet--not the one in Hollywood, of course, but the one stained with the blood of your enemies as well as your friends.

I have some advice for the soldiers, fighters, guerrillas and lieutenants who are carrying out these atrocities: stop. The precedent set at Nuremberg in 1945 gives you the right to refuse to obey orders that make you complicit in war crimes.

I would advise you to use that loophole before it gets used on you.

Update: Since the cease-fire began, the death toll in Gaza has risen to over 1,300. According to the New York Times, that number includes 104 women and 410 children and is expected to continue rising as more bodies are discovered. The Western media has done everything it can to sanitize Israel's ethnic cleansing of Gaza, if not bury it outright.

Israel is not right by virtue of the Holocaust being wrong. I am convinced that Israel's policies of terror and ethnic cleansing in Gaza are not designed to weaken Hamas militarily, but to terrorize the Palestinian people into capitulation with Israel and their puppet, Fatah. The words "Never Again" (referring to the Holocaust) are burned into the minds of every Jewish person. Certainly , we would Never Again want to see the Jewish people subjected to such a fate. It is, perhaps the saddest irony that the state that rose from the near-annihilation of a people, wrought by the Hitlerian Apocalypse, should then go on to do the same thing to another people. The State of Israel has conducted for decades--in full view of the world--a campaign for lebensraum (living space) that the rest of the world stopped the Nazis from achieving. This has been done with the full protection and aid of the United States Government and military, including the provision of advanced weaponry, such as Apache helicopters, DIME bombs and white phosphorus.

Did Never Again mean that, as a people, the Jews would never again allow a power to rise in the world that would bring a people--any people--to the brink of annihilation, or were they simply referring to themselves? Opinion is starkly divided on this, even among the Jews. The Nation of Israel will have to decide for itself, but it will do so with the fingers of a conscientious world pointing back to Auchwitz, Bergen-Belsen and Dachau and then to Gaza; from a Germany at the height of its power under the Third Reich and then back to a 21st Century Israel, standing at the threshold of empire.